The New U.S.-Russia-Ukraine Mineral Deal: A Spiritually Satanic RICO TRAP!

February 27, 2025

A Complex Collision of Interests, a Biblical Plea for Justice, and Steve Bannon’s Warning to Walk Away.

In February 2025, discussions surrounding U.S.-Russia relations have taken a surprising and dramatic turn. High-level talks suggest a newfound willingness between Washington and Moscow to pursue economic cooperation, particularly focused on critical minerals such as rare earth elements and aluminum. Recent commentary indicates that both President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin have hinted at the possibility of large-scale agreements—potentially amounting to trillions of dollars in economic value.

Meanwhile, the ongoing war in Ukraine continues to cast a long and tragic shadow over any discussion of mineral resources, defense spending, or economic partnerships. Some argue that Russia’s occupation of approximately 18–20% of Ukrainian territory—encompassing areas rich in coal, iron ore, and rare earth deposits—constitutes an impediment to Ukraine’s economic recovery. Others see it as the pivot on which new U.S.-Russia negotiations might turn. Within this backdrop, an even more controversial narrative has emerged, one that accuses the United States, particularly under the prior Biden administration, of bearing significant responsibility for the origins of the Ukrainian conflict.

Adding fuel to the fire, the largest RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) complaint in world history is reportedly about to be dropped by civil rights activist and biblical scholar WLBJ. This sweeping legal action purports to implicate global financial giants like BlackRock, the Military-Industrial Complex (MIC), think tanks, and rogue elements of the CIA in orchestrating wars for profit—sometimes by financing terrorist proxies—only to reap massive gains through reconstruction. The moral, spiritual, and, most immediately, legal repercussions of exploiting Ukraine’s resources are coming to a head. Questions loom: Will President Trump risk being entangled in what may soon be exposed as a vast racketeering scheme that thrives on war profiteering? Or will he heed warnings—such as those from Steve Bannon—to distance himself from “cursed blood money” and walk away from Ukraine before America is further drawn into a moral, spiritual, and legal quagmire?

The Maidan Protests

In late 2013 and early 2014, massive protests erupted in Ukraine, centered on Kyiv’s Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Independence Square). These demonstrations, known collectively as the Euromaidan protests, initially called for closer ties with the European Union and an end to corruption. They evolved into a national movement that toppled President Viktor Yanukovych, who was accused of halting an EU association agreement in favor of closer ties with Russia.

Claims of a U.S.-Backed Coup

Critics assert that these events were not just a spontaneous democratic uprising. They point to alleged involvement by the CIA and the direct actions of Victoria Nuland, then the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. A leaked phone call between Nuland and U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt—famous for her remark “F*** the EU”—revealed an American preference for certain opposition leaders in Ukraine, viewed by some as evidence of a “rogue CIA coup” designed to topple Yanukovych and install pro-Western figures in power.

Professor Jeffrey Sachs, an economist who has sharply criticized NATO expansion and U.S. foreign policy, supports the broader contention that Western actions played a pivotal role in Ukraine’s upheaval. While acknowledging the complexity of events, he has repeatedly argued that the United States pushed NATO ever closer to Russia, thereby provoking an inevitable backlash from Moscow.

The Roots of Russian Anger

For Russia, the events of 2014 and the prospect of Ukraine firmly allying with the West (and possibly joining NATO) were perceived as existential threats. Moscow claims that NATO expansion into the former Soviet sphere violates the understandings reached at the close of the Cold War. Although not codified into a legally binding treaty, many interpret certain Western verbal assurances to mean that the alliance would not move “one inch eastward.”

Critics of Western policy maintain that ignoring Russia’s security concerns created a climate in which President Vladimir Putin felt compelled to act, first by annexing Crimea in 2014, then by launching a broader military operation in Ukraine in February 2022. Under this view, Russia is the victim of encroachment and repeated Western violations of its so-called “red lines.”

The Military-Industrial Complex and BlackRock

The Military-Industrial Complex (MIC) is a term popularized by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1961. It refers to the close relationship among governments, military forces, and private companies producing defense technology. Critics argue that the MIC’s profit-driven motives can keep conflicts going rather than seeking peace, as war boosts armament sales and bolsters defense budgets.

BlackRock, one of the world’s largest asset management firms, is said to hold significant shares in major defense contractors. Managing trillions of dollars in assets, BlackRock has a stake in nearly every sector, including the defense industry. Concerns arise when major investors stand to profit from both arms manufacturing (during wartime) and the subsequent rebuilding of war-torn nations.

Profiting from Rebuilding Ukraine

BlackRock has reportedly positioned itself to guide foreign investment into Ukraine’s infrastructure once the war ends. Memoranda of understanding between Ukrainian officials and BlackRock outline plans for the firm to advise on reconstruction funds. Critics view this as a prime example of “disaster capitalism,” in which the same entities that profit from wartime arms sales further benefit from post-conflict rebuilding.

From a moral standpoint, this cycle reveals a form of racketeering:

Such an arrangement hovers on the edges of what Scripture calls wickedness—exemplifying the theft of resources, the devastation of lands, and the exploitation of human suffering for financial gain.

Control Over Ukrainian Land and Resources

As of February 2025, estimates suggest that Russia occupies approximately 18–20% of Ukraine’s territory, including Crimea and significant parts of the Donbas, plus portions of the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. These areas are known for:

With these territories under Russian control, Ukraine struggles to rebuild its economy and maintain sovereignty over its remaining resources. Meanwhile, there are indications that Russia may be leveraging access to these occupied minerals as part of negotiations with the United States or other Western entities. Some fear that any large-scale deals could legitimize Russia’s territorial claims or effectively reward the act of invasion.

Russia’s Own Mineral Wealth

Beyond Ukrainian territory, Russia itself possesses vast reserves of oil, natural gas, and minerals—particularly rare earth elements crucial to high-tech manufacturing. President Vladimir Putin has offered collaboration with President Trump on mining ventures within Russia’s internationally recognized borders, suggesting large aluminum exports to stabilize U.S. markets and potential joint projects in rare earth sectors.

Analysts speculate that such deals may be used by Russia to seek tacit Western acceptance of its holdings in Ukraine, effectively creating a bargaining chip out of occupied lands. Critics warn that any acceptance of this arrangement could set a dangerous precedent, undermining principles of national sovereignty. The US Must resist accepting any minerals from Ukraine's land whether Russian occupied or not. Spiritually and legally, the US is free to partner with Russia using minerals from Russia's OWN territory and should by all means pursue these deals.

While geopolitical maneuvering, economic interests, and military considerations often dominate headlines, a deeper spiritual dimension looms behind the conflict. Many interpret the ongoing power struggle—especially the profiteering by intelligence agencies and war industries—as fueled by the spirit of Azazel and the Jezebel spirit, both of which are Biblically associated with deception, manipulation, and destruction.

The Spirit of Azazel and the CIA-MIC Nexus

In some spiritual interpretations, Azazel is understood to be a demonic force associated with scapegoating, desolation, and leading people astray into destructive practices. This aligns with the idea that certain Rogue agents within the CIA and the MIC (Military-Industrial Complex) and "Think Tanks" deliberately provoke conflicts in order to profit from the production and sale of weapons. These agents, defense contractors and think tanks may not realize what spirit they are of. (See Luke 9: 51-55 must view in KJV). By attributing these agendas to a spirit of Azazel, one posits that the underlying force drives nation-states to engage in endless cycles of war, plunder, and bloodshed—effectively sacrificing peace at the altar of profit.

Those who see the CIA and the MIC as orchestrators of global strife argue that these institutions embody the spirit of Azazel by continually “offering up” innocent lives to generate profit. Shadowy intelligence operations, such as the alleged 2014 coup in Ukraine, become ways of creating strategic chaos. Out of that chaos comes the opportunity for arms deals, defense budgets, and the spoils of war.

The Jezebel Spirit—Queen of Manipulation and Mass Murder

Jezebel, a queen mentioned in the Old Testament (1 Kings 16:31, 1 Kings 18–21), is notorious for her ruthlessness in consolidating power. She manipulated her husband, King Ahab, orchestrated the murder of Naboth to steal his vineyard (1 Kings 21), oppressed the faithful prophets of God, and sought to silence or kill anyone who opposed her reign of terror.

Today, the Jezebel spirit is often invoked to describe leaders or governments that engage in manipulation, false accusations, unjust killings, and the destruction of moral and religious foundations. Critics draw parallels between Jezebel’s tactics and those employed by certain modern political figures. They assert that Ukraine’s current leadership—led by President Volodymyr Zelensky—mirrors Jezebel’s example in the systematic repression of religious voices, the alleged selling off of national resources to foreign interests, and the betrayal of the very people they vowed to protect.

Zelensky is accused of profiteering from weapon sales, pillaging his own country, and silencing dissent. In this view, his administration embodies the Jezebel spirit by waging a campaign of corruption and authoritarian control while simultaneously posturing as a savior of the nation—mirroring Jezebel’s ability to operate under a facade of legitimacy.

The Human Toll

Amid the swirl of international negotiations, sinister spiritual forces, and resource deals, the human cost of the Ukraine conflict remains devastating. Soldiers on both sides have died in large numbers, leaving spouses, children, and parents devastated. Civilians face shelling, displacement, and shortages of basic necessities. Entire communities hang in the balance, their hopes for a normal life overshadowed by the violence and upheaval around them.

Families who have lost loved ones continue to suffer while global powers haggle over mineral rights and potential windfall profits. The heartbreak on the ground is a stark reminder that any narrative of war as a mere exchange of resources or strategic advantage ignores the profound suffering of ordinary people.

Zelensky’s Alleged Complicity and the Jezebel Parallel

President Volodymyr Zelensky began his tenure promising a break from corruption. However, critics see him as a CIA asset who sold his country’s sovereignty for personal gain—effectively playing into the hands of the MIC and allied corporations like BlackRock and Monsanto. Rumors abound that Zelensky and his cabinet have purchased luxury properties in France and Switzerland, indulging in lavish lifestyles at the expense of Ukraine’s desperate population.

He should be arrested for selling half of Ukraine’s weapons, embezzling war funds, and colluding with foreign corporations to exploit the nation’s farmland and mineral deposits. In line with the biblical account of Jezebel orchestrating the murder of Naboth to seize his vineyard, Zelensky’s actions are seen as a similar form of spiritual treachery—robbing Ukrainians of their birthright while oppressing any who stand in his way. Additionally, just as Jezebel killed the prophets of God, Zelensky is accused of persecuting or ignoring the Ukrainian faithful who call for peace, transparency, and an end to corruption.

A Call for Immediate Accountability

The moral imperative is clear: leaders who betray their own people for profit must face justice. If Zelensky travels abroad—especially to the United States—he should be taken into custody and charged with war profiteering and high-level corruption. Failing to hold him accountable not only continues Ukraine’s agony but also emboldens other leaders operating under the same spirits of Azazel and Jezebel, fueling an unholy cycle of war, exploitation, and mass deception.

Part VI: The Biblical Warning, the Coming Day of Reckoning, and the Moral Imperative for the U.S.

The Scripture Speaks of Judgment and Reckoning
The Bible repeatedly underscores that God keeps a precise record of human actions. This theme is reflected in passages like:

These verses attest that no individual—nor any nation—can escape God’s ledger of accountability. When wars are waged for profit, when spiritual corruption infests the highest echelons of government, and when the vulnerable are exploited, Scripture declares that there will be a day of reckoning.

The Spirit of Azazel, the Jezebel Spirit, and America’s Role

From a Christian standpoint, the infiltration of the spirit of Azazel among intelligence and military-industrial circles leads to unbridled aggression and the commodification of human lives. Meanwhile, the Jezebel spirit in certain world leaders fosters manipulation, persecution, and theft of resources, echoing the biblical account of Jezebel’s reign of terror. Together, they form a potent blend of spiritual evil driving global conflict.

If the United States—even under the leadership of President Trump—ignores this dark alliance, it risks falling under the same condemnation described in these biblical texts. By acquiescing to or directly participating in war profiteering schemes, America stands on treacherous ground. The day of reckoning will not spare those who choose to profit from spilled blood and devastated communities.

Why the U.S. Must Halt BlackRock, Monsanto, and the Racketeering Machine

Major American corporations, particularly BlackRock and Monsanto, have been implicated in what many call a massive racketeering scheme. BlackRock invests heavily in defense contractors, reaping profits from escalating military budgets. Monsanto, known for its aggressive forays into agribusiness, reportedly eyes Ukrainian farmland to expand its biotech footprint. If allowed to proceed unchecked, these corporate giants will exploit Ukraine’s weakened state, guaranteeing themselves lucrative returns while average Ukrainians suffer the consequences of war and displacement.

Romans 13:10 (KJV) declares, “Love worketh no ill to his neighbor…” To love one’s neighbor is to abstain from predatory practices and the pillaging of another nation’s resources. The U.S. must, therefore, rein in these companies—enacting strict regulations, refusing to grant legal or diplomatic cover, and severing any alliances that facilitate economic plunder. Failing to do so places the nation among those indicted by passages such as Isaiah 10:1-2, which warns, “Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees… to turn aside the needy from judgment.”

The Moral Red Line and the Global Consequences

Any arrangement granting the U.S. direct or indirect access to Ukraine’s minerals—either through Zelensky’s complicit government or through Russia’s occupation—crosses a moral line. It implies that might makes right, sanctioning the appropriation of a war-torn nation’s wealth to benefit corporate giants. This stands in stark opposition to the biblical commands to practice righteousness and justice, especially toward the afflicted.

If America refuses to stop BlackRock, Monsanto, and other predatory corporations from exploiting Ukraine, the moral outcome is a foregone conclusion: condemnation by those who see the spiritual darkness behind these machinations, and ultimately, condemnation on the Day of Judgment when all secrets are laid bare. As Galatians 6:7 (KJV) declares, “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”

Bannon’s Take: “Cursed Blood Money”

Amid these high-stakes negotiations, former White House strategist

@Bannon_Stev

has emerged as a vocal critic of any prospective U.S.-Ukraine “economic partnership.” Though no longer serving in an official capacity, Bannon’s influence endures in certain political circles. Recently, he branded the proposed mineral deals in Ukraine “cursed blood money,” underscoring the profound moral risk of profiteering from lands marred by war and death. For Bannon, every dollar tied to Ukrainian resources is tainted by the bloodshed that has already soaked the country, especially when American tax dollars—allocations many believe were already misused—are on the line.

We Have Our Own Minerals

Bannon also stresses that the United States possesses ample natural resources within its own borders. Borrowing from the lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan—where trillions of dollars were sunk overseas—he contends those same funds could rebuild decaying American infrastructure and industry. Drawing on “America First” principles, Bannon argues that, rather than seeking out contested minerals in Ukraine, President Trump could better serve the nation by focusing on development at home.

Avoid Another “Protectorate” Entanglement

Bannon likens a U.S.-Ukraine arrangement to a quasi-colonial protectorate. If American firms (backed by U.S. military guarantees) take over Ukraine’s resources, Washington could become morally and legally tethered to defending those assets indefinitely. Bannon reminds Americans of their own anti-colonial roots, warning that the “bloodlands” of Eastern Europe would inevitably pull the U.S. into further entanglements—an echo of the same manipulative dynamic fueling the military-industrial machine.

The Jezebel Spirit Revisited

Bannon’s warning dovetails with the Jezebel analogy: if Ukrainian leadership truly embodies the Jezebel spirit—manipulating foreign powers for profit, silencing dissent, and selling the nation’s birthright—then any formal arrangement with that regime risks complicity. From a biblical standpoint, legitimate business deals should not underwrite or condone spiritual corruption. Bannon’s clarion call is that the U.S. must “walk away” before it inadvertently validates or enriches a morally compromised government.

5D Chess: Gaza as a Prelude

Bannon suggests President Trump might be playing “5D chess”—a phrase denoting a highly complex, multi-layered strategy. Trump’s unexpected proposal regarding Gaza, for instance, might be a maneuver to shift broader Middle East discussions away from full-scale war. Similarly, if Trump initially appears open to Ukraine’s minerals but later pivots—especially if those resources are overstated—he could extricate the U.S. from the deal without sacrificing American credibility. Such a move would be lauded by those who see moral corruption in forging alliances based on blood-stained assets.

Why Isn’t Bannon in the Cabinet?

Bannon’s outsider status allows him to speak bluntly, but it also raises the question of whether Trump should bring him back into the formal fold. His unwavering caution against “cursed” deals in Ukraine and the moral pitfalls of war profiteering align with the emerging legal and spiritual complexities. Whether Bannon remains a free agent or returns to official power, his perspective stands in stark contrast to advisors who might prioritize short-term gains over the long-term moral (and legal) interests of the United States.

Part VIII: Outlining the RICO Complaint and Trump’s Imperative to Walk Away

Key Allegations in WLBJ’s Looming RICO Case

The Proposed Relief: Dissolve and Disgorge

According to advance leaks, the RICO complaint seeks:

Why President Trump Must Avoid “Blood Profits”

Should President Trump move forward with an arrangement that taps into Ukrainian minerals—particularly in conflict zones or under an administration accused of Jezebel-level corruption—he risks entangling himself in the very racketeering scheme on the verge of public exposure. By associating the United States with “blood profits,” he would risk:

Seizing Illicit Funds to Pay Down the Deficit

WLBJ’s plan demands that any seized illegal war profits be redirected to pay down America’s national debt, rather than burdening taxpayers or the conflict-ravaged people of Ukraine. This approach ensures that:

The Final Warning: Heed Bannon and WLBJ

From a practical standpoint, President Trump stands at a crossroads: proceed with deals that may offer immediate economic allure but carry “cursed” moral baggage—and potentially violate federal racketeering statutes—or walk away. Steve Bannon’s admonition underscores that the U.S. has sufficient minerals of its own, and the spiritual dimension of Azazel and Jezebel warns that no short-term windfall justifies complicity in human suffering.

Walking away also positions the United States as a moral leader, one that upholds the biblical mandate to “do justly, and to love mercy” (Micah 6:8). By rejecting war-based exploitation, Trump can demonstrate a commitment to justice, spare America from RICO fallout, and lead a national pivot toward dismantling the profiteering machine altogether.

Conclusion: A Prophetic Call to Resist Azazel, Jezebel, and the Racketeering Machine

The world stands at a spiritual, geopolitical, and now legal crossroads. On one hand, the U.S. and Russia appear on the cusp of a multi-trillion-dollar economic partnership that could reshape global mineral markets; on the other, the tragedy and corruption in Ukraine demand a sober moral reckoning. Civil rights activist and biblical scholar WLBJ’s looming RICO complaint threatens to expose how a hidden deep state—comprising rogue elements in intelligence agencies, powerful think tanks, and corporate behemoths like BlackRock—systematically orchestrates wars for profit, finances terrorists, engineers false narratives, and capitalizes on reconstruction.

If these allegations hold weight, President Trump risks ensnaring America in a scheme that stands on the brink of public disclosure. Steve Bannon’s stark admonition is clear: any attempt to seize Ukrainian minerals, particularly in occupied territories or under Zelensky’s dubious governance, constitutes “cursed blood money.” According to Bannon, America does not need foreign minerals badly enough to justify moral or spiritual compromise; the U.S. can invest in its own resources, avoid another endless security guarantee, and steer clear of a massive RICO entanglement.

From a biblical perspective, the condemnation of war profiteering is absolute. Ancient powers like Azazel seduce nations into endless conflict, while Jezebel exemplifies the tyrannical manipulation of leaders who betray their people. God’s Word warns that every deception, every unjust gain, and every drop of innocent blood will be judged. To proceed down the path of pillaging Ukraine’s resources would be to invite that judgment—both from history and from the divine.

Will President Trump heed this warning? Will the United States confront the forces that orchestrate conflict for profit, or will it succumb to short-term economic temptations? With the largest RICO complaint in history about to drop, the stakes could not be higher. Amid rumors of nuclear brinkmanship and manipulated foreign wars, there is still room for moral clarity: walk away before becoming complicit in a catastrophic racketeering scheme that threatens not only the soul of a nation but the very fabric of global peace.

“Do you want me to lie to you, or do you want me to tell you the truth? I have chosen the latter.  The New U.S.-Russia-Ukraine mineral deal Is a satanic RICO TRAP, designed to eventually curse the United States and bring our country down spiritually. Please don't take the bait. God gave us our own resources for a reason. Let's show the world why we have been named One nation Under God. Because we lead the world in faithfulness to the True God of all the Universe, The God Of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, God The Father and His Son, The Lord Jesus Christ. May @realdonaldtrump do the right thing; The United States must not touch any of those minerals that rogue members of our government and corporate racketeers were after. We must help Ukraine rebuild with their own mineral sales to others who were not involved in this satanic racketeering and mass murder scheme. We may biblically choose to do business with Russia but it must not include any minerals from land Russia seized as we, via the Biden administration, had a manipulative and murderous instigating hand in that and we mustn't touch it. Russia has minerals of its own that we can partner with them on.

Please, remember, God keeps a record of everything and the books will be opened one day. Let us be able to say, on that fateful day, in integrity and righteousness, we walked away!

May God Have Mercy On Your Souls,
In His Love,
WLBJ